clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Manchester United v Arsenal: Fun Facts and Figures

A roundup of damning statistics and chalkboards following Arsenal's apathetic defeat against Manchester United

Alex Livesey

Before the match, I discussed the possibility of Arsenal controlling the midfield. Despite a man advantage, though, they utterly failed to do so, and Michael Carrick ran the game with Arsenal players rarely putting pressure on him, and spreading the ball to Rafael, pushing forward, untracked by Lukas Podolski, and Wayne Rooney.


Meanwhile, Wayne Rooney and Robin van Persie kept Mikel Arteta in close-attendance, which resulted in Arsenal's top passer being Per Mertesacker, and the second top passer being Thomas Vermaelen. Vermaelen to Mertesacker was the most common combination of the game, showing that despite Arsenal having an edge in possession, it was all at the back, as the below chalkboard shows: Arsenal were simply unable to break through Manchester United's defence, especially as the two main creative players, Jack Wilshere and Santi Cazorla, struggled.


With Arteta being marked, Wenger tried to alleviate that by having Cazorla play deeper in the first half, and thus get on the ball, but too often in those deep positions, Arsenal's movement was too poor for Cazorla to start playing pretty possession football, or create chances. One moment in the first half summed this up perfectly; Cazorla got the ball after good play from Aaron Ramsey, and had Podolski and Giroud ahead of him. Giroud made a run to the right, creating space for Podolski to dart into, but the German failed to, and Arsenal lost the ball.


Consequently, Giroud tried coming deep to link up with his midfield, but the movement beyond him was effectively non-existent, making United's defensive job easy. I'm not sure if Arsenal would've done better if they had Robin van Persie; they might've done, considering his movement is so good, but given Giroud's lack of service, it's tempting to say they wouldn't have. One would like to say that things will get better, but on the evidence of this season, I'm not sure if it's feasible to do so, and here are some reasons why:

  • In three of their past four League and Champions League games, Arsenal have failed to register a shot on target until the 90th minute (Norwich, Schalke, Manchester United)
  • Arsenal had two shots on target today, both coming after 92 mintues. The number of shots on target they had equalled the number of goals Stoke City scored in their trip to Old Trafford two weeks ago.
  • Arsenal have fewer goals than every other team in the top 7, including Fulham who visit the Emirates next weekend.
  • While Arsenal have conceded the fewest goals in the league, they have only one one-goal victory in the league this season.
  • Arsenal have scored two goals and over just three times this season (Liverpool, Southampton and West Ham).
  • Excluding the 6-1 result against Southampton which is starting to look more of an anomaly, Arsenal have scored 9 goals and conceded 7, in 9 games.
  • This is now Arsenal's worst start in the Premier League era, 1 point worse than last season (which could "never" happen again).
  • At this point last season, Arsenal had scored 20 goals in 10 games, compared to 15 in 10 games this season.
  • Arsenal have two goals in their last 270 minutes of Premier League football, which matches the scoring drought from the beginning of the season. Then, the excuse was that Arsenal needed time to mesh. What's the reasoning now?